| Mueller highlights Trump's lies; 'motivated reasoning;' top takeaways; late-night laughs; Facebook's epic day; Thursday's big stories; HBO updates Posted: 24 Jul 2019 09:22 PM PDT Trump lies with reckless abandon. He did it again on Wednesday after Robert Mueller contradicted several of his fictions about the Mueller Report... BREAKING: Ricardo Rosselló, the embattled governor of Puerto Rico, just announced his resignation, effective August 2, via a video message on Facebook. That's sure to be one of the top stories on Thursday -- here's a look at some others -- starting with Trump v. Mueller...
| | Big Lies
Either you reject the lies, or you accept the lies.
Of all the divides in American life today, this is the divide I keep thinking about. President Trump and his allies lie with reckless abandon. They make dishonest politicians from the past look like amateurs. When they get called out, they lie about the lying. Trump did this on Wednesday after Robert Mueller contradicted several of the president's fictions about the Mueller Report. When PBS "NewsHour" correspondent Yamiche Alcindor pointed this out to him, citing Mueller's own words, Trump denied it and insulted Alcindor.
I'm often told that people are "numb" to Trump's noise and nonsense. But let's examine this for a minute:
Why is there not more outrage?
Some people, primarily fans of Trump, excuse or rationalize the lies for various reasons. Other people simply cannot. So much of the anti-Trump outrage from progressives and anti-Trump conservatives and columnists and pundits boils down to "He's deceiving you. He's lying to your face. Don't you care?"
And the press is right smack dab in the middle of this because advocating for facts gets you labeled "fake news." Which is, again, another lie.
Old-fashioned tenets of the news business fade away in this fog of disinformation. For example: "What the president says is news." I still think that's true, but when he's telling you not to believe your own eyes and ears, is it really news?
Mueller's best moments
Robert Mueller was probably the most-criticized man in America on Wednesday. And I'll get to that shortly. But I thought his strongest moments as a witness were when he debunked Trump's claims about Russia, WikiLeaks, the special counsel probe, etc. This CNN banner summed it up perfectly: "Mueller: Trump was not exonerated, Russia's election attack was no hoax and investigation was no witch hunt."
The hearings also reminded viewers about the remarkable number of Trump associates who were caught making "false statements" to the authorities. Here's Aaron Blake's headline for WaPo "Mueller paints a picture of lies and deception by the Trump team."
Mueller's repeated affirmations of reality led NBC's Jonathan Allen to tweet, "One thing that gets lost because we've become so accustomed to it is the number of things the president has said to the public that Mueller has said his investigation found were lies, from hoax to having no business dealings in Russia. Lying to the public used to hurt presidents."
Rationales for the lies
"Lying to the public used to hurt presidents," Allen wrote. Well it HAS hurt Trump too -- he's never been able to crack 50% in reliable approval rating polls, and about two thirds of voters describe him as dishonest, which means even some of his supporters know that he's deceitful, and they accept it.
What are the explanations and excuses for the Pinocchios? I've heard many:
-- Some Trump supporters say he is speaking to a "larger truth," even though he's not getting the smaller facts right. Example: When he tells stories about illegal voting, he's calling attention to a threat they perceive to be real and looking out for their votes.
-- Other Trump supporters openly accept his personality flaws, and sometimes tepidly criticize his worst impulses, in exchange for long-sought-after policy achievements.
-- Some backers also say "all politicians lie," ignoring the fact that Trump's lies are in a league of their own.
-- They also excuse some of his deception as trolling, you know, "owning the libs."
-- And there are two powerful words that make it a lot easier to look the other way: "We're winning."
-- Academics typically note that the conservative media machine doesn't do a lot of fact-checking, preferring to promote even the president's most unhinged statements.
-- Influential members of the pro-Trump media dismiss fact-checking as liberal propaganda, further insulating the base.
-- Hardcore members of "the resistance" like to say Trump fans are members of a cult.
"Motivated reasoning"
I asked political scientist and Dartmouth professor Brendan Nyhan about this. "We often struggle to tell why people believe stuff," he told me candidly. "There's a lot of research on 'motivated reasoning' including my work that finds people apply less scrutiny to information that affirms their priors and more scrutiny to information that contradicts them. Other theories are that people affirm things they know to be false at least to some extent to express their political feelings / affiliations or that doing so is a way to signal your loyalty to a leader."
Thus, a profoundly important probe into a Russian attack on the U.S. election becomes a "hoax" because the leader says so...
Does the brain adapt?
I also called up Tali Sharot, the director of the Affective Brain Lab and the author of "The Influential Mind." Along with several colleagues, she looked at how people adapt to lying over time. "When they lie, they have a negative emotional arousal in the mind," she said, akin to self-punishment. But emotion "really adapts quite quickly." The more people lie, the less they feel that emotional reaction.
Sharot wonders: As a person lies more egregiously, do the people around them adapt, too? "It kind of becomes a norm," she suspects. When I brought up Trump, she said, "I think many people get used to the lying and they no longer see it as negative as they did a few years ago."
Trumpworld even lies about the lies!
This exchange happened outside the W.H. on Tuesday:
Reporter: "The President said that he had been asked by Indian Prime Minister Modi to mediate between India and Pakistan. India says that is not even close to truth. Did the president just make that up, sir?"
Larry Kudlow: "No, the President doesn't make anything up. That's a very rude question, in my opinion. I am going to stay out of that. It is outside of my lane."
The lying should be front and center
Reject the lies or accept the lies. That's the divide. But there IS a third option: Report. Document all of the deception. That's what journalists like Daniel Dale, now of CNN, do. He wrote about one of Trump's falsehoods on Wednesday evening.
But Dale is still the exception. Most media outlets still aren't putting the lying front and center most of the time. Many news outlets are still wary of using the word. And I get it -- not everything is a lie -- but many of the president's tweets and quotes can fairly be described as misleading, manipulative or illogical even when not completely fact-free. A growing number of White House correspondents, broadcasters and columnists are forthright about that. But there's still a reluctance in some newsrooms to tell that truth. (Look at the recent debate over whether to label his racist tweets racist.) The result: The bar is set far lower for Trump than for other political leaders.
Thursday's Page One | | The NYT's front page focuses on Mueller's warning of "new meddling" by Russia, with a separate story about Mueller's "halting delivery..."
The end of the impeachment debate?
Oliver Darcy emails: When the history books are written, I think Wednesday will likely be remembered as the day that any chance of an impeachment inquiry stemming from the Russia probe was put to bed. Republicans already did not believe Mueller, and there was little chance he could say anything to change their minds. Mueller's testimony needed to compel Democrats into action, and persuade the minds of Americans who live in the political middle. It didn't.
Mueller's report might be damning, but his performance was anything but. His lackluster testimony -- during which he often appeared befuddled and confused -- actually aided Republicans and Trump allies in aiming to delegitimize Mueller's findings. Clips of Mueller looking puzzled are already flying around in the right-wing media universe and being hyped by Trump. So while it's unlikely the testimony will move the needle for Democrats in Congress or people in the center of the country, it will certainly work to harden Trump's base...
The "optics" debate
All over social media on Wednesday, there were complaints about pundits who were commenting on the "optics" of the hearings, criticizing both Mueller and Democratic leaders. "Optics" is now a meme.
Chuck Todd came in for particular criticism because he tweeted that Mueller's answers were substantively newsworthy, "but on optics, this was a disaster." CJR's Maria Bustillos responded: "Politics isn't entertainment, it is not a performance to be critiqued. Reporting on national politics is a public trust of solemn importance that affects hundreds of millions of people." But here's the counter-argument via Politico's Jake Sherman: "In scheduling this hearing, Democrats TOLD us it was about optics. Bringing the report to life, they said. They told us very little new would be learned, but having Mueller say it would be impactful. House Democrats said it was about optics."
"Important" without being "exciting"
Brian Lowry emails: During the first session, MSNBC legal analyst Chuck Rosenberg issued what felt like a rebuke to some of his colleagues: "There's a difference between exciting and important. There are things that are exciting that are not important, and there are things that are important that are not particularly exciting."
It¹s fair to say many people took Rosenberg's statement as being directed at Todd, but it could easily apply to any number of people who were characterizing the testimony as a "disaster" almost as soon as it began, or those getting too carried away with "report is the book; this is the movie" analogy.
Clearly, the audience that has been highly engaged with the Trump presidency has had a bad reaction to the assumptions that today's hearings needed to bring glitz or showmanship to the narrative. In a way, it all dovetails with the notion that the impact from the day will come less from the hours watched live than the way the individual points and assertions reinforced by the testimony are recycled and spun — a process, admittedly, which will see people receive that information through their customary news bubbles...
FOR THE RECORD, PART ONE
-- "With a six-week August recess looming and the views of most Americans fixed on what is now a two-year-old story line, a lasting shift in public opinion appears unlikely," the NYT's Nicholas Fandos wrote...
-- Susan Glasser's recap for The New Yorker: "Concerns about Mueller's performance are not mere theatre criticism. He was unable to defend his report and its findings beyond referring to the text, over and over again. He needed to explain in clear terms the conclusions he reached and why. He didn't..."
-- "After watching Mueller's frequently halting, monosyllabic testimony come far short of Democrats' hopes for a made-for-TV moment that might catapult a case for impeachment, the President's demeanor shifted from irritation to triumph," CNN's Jeremy Diamond reported...
-- Rachel Maddow's message on Wednesday night: "I hope that members of Congress, in particular the leadership in Congress, recognizes that OPEN HEARINGS, open hearings before the cameras, are really important for the country, in terms of dealing with even the most controversial issues." She added: "I hope these are the first of many..."
Compare and contrast
Trump looked like a fighter when he was seen pacing back and forth and fielding Q's from the press. He repeatedly said "you're fake news" and called a questioner "one of the worst."
One hour later, Nancy Pelosi spoke like a friend when she was wrapping up a press conference. "President Lincoln said public sentiment is everything. Well in order for the public to have the sentiment, the public has to know," she said. "So I hope you will be messengers of the truth to the public. We think today was really a milestone, in making that sentiment be more informed."
--> For another compare and contrast, I tweeted out Trump's "no obstruction" poster from May and Pelosi's "no exoneration" poster from Wednesday...
How it was all covered on Fox
"There was the potential for the testimony to be especially significant for Fox News Channel viewers," the AP's David Bauder wrote, "since the network's opinion hosts had repeatedly derided Mueller over the course of the investigation and gave Trump frequent opportunities to wrongfully declare the report had cleared him. Unvarnished hearing coverage could give many Trump fans in the audience a chance to hear what they hadn't before."
But "the reaction from Fox's on-air personnel Wednesday: There's nothing to worry about. Fox's Chris Wallace, during the first break in the Judiciary Committee hearing, said, 'This has been a disaster for the Democrats and a disaster for the reputation of Robert Mueller.' The remark was transcribed and quickly tweeted by Trump..."
What Hannity said: | | Rudy Giuliani started and ended his day on Fox -- pre-spinning the hearing on "Fox & Friends" and then taking a victory lap on Sean Hannity's show.
The Daily Beast's Maxwell Tani and Andrew Kirell noted that several House Republicans grilled Mueller with "Hannity's questions..." Comedy Central's "The Daily Show" produced a mash-up along the same lines, featuring Devin Nunes...
>> And this was just announced by Fox: Trump will call into Hannity's show Thursday night. Fox is billing it as an "exclusive interview..."
FOR THE RECORD, PART TWO
-- WaPo's version of the Mueller Report book was back in Amazon's top 10 on Wednesday during and after the hearings... (Amazon)
-- Michael Grynbaum: "On Wednesday, on the small screen, came the big reveal: Mr. Mueller was merely human, after all..." (NYT)
-- Max Boot's column for WaPo: "Mueller wins on the facts — but loses on TV..." (WaPo)
-- Slate published a list of major news events that were overshadowed by the Mueller hearing, including Boris Johnson officially becoming the U.K.'s prime minister and a suicide bombing in Somalia... (Slate)
Late-night roundup
The headline on Frank Pallotta's story: "Mueller might have bombed his hearings, but in late night Trump was the butt of the joke."
"The Daily Show's Trevor Noah told his audience during his opening segment that Mueller explained that President Trump can be charged with obstruction of justice after he leaves office. 'So you know what that means? Trump is never leaving office,' Noah said. 'He hears that, the Secret Service is going to be banging on the Oval Office door like, Sir, you need to leave and he'll be like, No housekeeping. Thank you!'" More here...
Look out for the ratings on Thursday...
I fell asleep at one point during the hearings, but maybe I was the only one. I'm curious to see how high- or low-rated the telecasts were. I'll have a full story up on CNN Business on Thursday...
THURSDAY PLANNER
-- Amazon and Alphabet will report earnings after the close...
-- The DOJ is expected to announce its approval of the T-Mobile/Sprint merger after the close, as well...
-- BuzzFeed is holding its first invite-only "Internet Live" event... Lil Nas X is set to perform...
-- "Once Upon a Time In...Hollywood" is opening in theaters...
Pitaro and Le Batard are meeting on Thursday
"ESPN radio and TV host Dan Le Batard is expected to meet with network president Jimmy Pitaro Thursday in New York to discuss his future, according to three people with knowledge of the meeting," WaPo's Ben Strauss reports...
FOR THE RECORD, PART THREE
-- Tim Alberta's "American Carnage" has debuted at No. 2 on the NYT best seller list... (Twitter)
-- "Some of the day's most pointed media criticism lets its subjects do the talking." David Bauder took a look at the NowThis videos that tweak Fox News to great effect... (AP)
-- "Police officers in San Francisco did not tell a judge that a man they sought a search warrant for was a reporter, according to records released Tuesday..." (WaPo)
Liberal Super PAC announces "news" outlets to target swing state voters
Laney Pope emails: Priorities USA is funding "news" outlets that will float liberal ideas in swing states in the lead-up to the 2020 election. The liberal Super PAC says some of the $100 million it plans to spend will "flood swing states — many of which have lost their local papers — with stories favorable to the Democratic agenda," Vice's David Uberti reports. "Four 'news' outlets staffed by Democratic operatives will publish state-specific information across social media in Michigan, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Wisconsin. They'll also boost content by independent sources."
>> Priorities USA comms director Josh Schwerin: "This should be covered by local news, but local news is dying. Our hope is that we can help fill that hole a bit with paid media while also making it easier for the remaining local outlets to report by providing local angles on national policies with specific facts and people to tell their stories..."
>> The reactions on social media ranged from "good idea" (mostly from partisans) to "gross" (from reporters)...
>> Key context from Uberti's story: "Democrats are playing catch-up on the political 'news' front. Sites that sound like local papers like The Maine Examiner, Free Telegraph, and others have turned out to be cheap PR vehicles for GOP politicians..."
FOR THE RECORD, PART FOUR
By Laney Pope:
-- Cleveland.com is using the tool Project Text to test if readers will pay for local journalism over text. Ultimately, they are looking to see if the text payment plan "can sustain the salary of a hyperlocal journalist..." (NiemanLab)
Netflix is introducing a "mobile-only version of its streaming service" in India for 199 rupees or $2.80 a month... (The Verge)
-- Spotify acquires an individual podcast: "The 500 With Josh Adam Meyers" is being added to the service's "growing slate of Spotify Originals..." (THR)
What a day for Facebook...
1. Facebook began the day by settling with the FTC and agreeing to pay a record $5 billion fine. The long-expected punishment was announced just as the first Mueller hearing of the day was getting underway -- which got some journalists buzzing about whether this was an intentional "news dump."
2. "The FTC voted 3-2 to approve the settlement, with the agency's two Democrats dissenting because they believed the measure did not go far enough," Brian Fung reported. The Dems "believed the fines were far too small" and that the FTC wrongfully gave Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg a pass.
3. Zuckerberg, naturally, said the FTC settlement is significant. He said the company will hire "more than a thousand people" to assess and document the privacy risks of new features... He also said "we're going to change the way that we operate across the whole company, from the leadership down and the ground up." But the skepticism is widespread.
4. After the market close, FB reported $16.89 billion in revenue for the three months ending in June, "a 28% increase from the same period a year ago," Seth Fiegerman wrote. "The social network's audience continues to grow too. It hit 2.41 billion monthly active users in the quarter, up from 2.38 billion in the quarter prior."
5. And: FB's earnings release confirmed that the FTC opened up an antitrust investigation into the company last month. That's in addition to the DOJ's sweeping new antitrust review.
AT&T earnings ups and downs
Here's the lead from AT&T HQ's hometown paper, the Dallas Morning News: "AT&T lost nearly a million TV customers in the last three months, but company leaders emphasized Wednesday that they plan to grow its entertainment audience again by launching a new streaming service and an internet-based satellite dish replacement."
-- Dollars and cents: "AT&T's revenue increased by 15.3% to $44.96 billion in the second quarter, driven by growth from the Time Warner acquisition." (CNN is part of Time Warner, now called WarnerMedia.)
-- "Overall," WSJ's Drew FitzGerald wrote, "AT&T posted a second-quarter profit of $3.7 billion, or 51 cents a share, down from $5.1 billion or 81 cents a share, a year earlier. The drop in profit largely reflected accounting for pension plans. On an adjusted basis, AT&T said it had a profit of 89 cents in the latest period."
A new version of satellite TV without the satellite
AT&T plans "to address cord-cutting and rising pay-TV costs by deploying a new channel package called AT&T TV this quarter," FitzGerald wrote.
A device will plug into a customer's TV and stream a full lineup of channels via the internet. AT&T says it will "halve the cost of adding new customers by avoiding big expenses like rooftop dish installation." CEO Randall Stephenson said on Wednesday's earnings call that AT&T TV "will be the workhorse over the next couple of years..."
Live news and sports inside HBO Max, someday
Per Variety's Cynthia Littleton, Stephenson also told investors on Wednesday "that the HBO Max streaming service set to launch next spring will eventually include live sports and news programming." Not right away, but "ultimately" the service will have "unique live sports," he said, and "the same with news..."
Casey Bloys talks HBO Max
| | Brian Lowry emails: During HBO's TCA Press Tour session on Wednesday, programming chief Casey Bloys was asked about the impact of HBO Max. "HBO, as it exists, will be the core of any offering," he said, adding that the service is "not going to change" the network's programming strategy, which has already seen an increase in volume since AT&T took over.
Separately, HBO comms chief Quentin Schaffer -- who introduced Bloys -- received rare applause from the room, having recently announced that he's leaving the network after a 39-year tenure. Schaffer noted that he opted to stick around through the TV critics tour but looks forward to watching the Emmys on TV, for once, in September...
Wednesday's other HBO news
-- Sandra Gonzalez emails: Have we seen the last of the Monterey Five? It's possible. Casey Bloys says there are no current plans in the works for a third season. However...
-- Bloys also addressed the "Big Little Lies" director controversy...
-- And defended the final season of "Game of Thrones..."
-- And he said production on the as-yet-unnamed prequel has wrapped...
| | "The Boys" darkly details the corrupting side of superpowers
Brian Lowry emails: Superheroes are so abundant that superhero satires have become a plentiful subgenre. Add to Netflix's "The Umbrella Academy" and HBO's upcoming "Watchmen" a new Amazon series, "The Boys." Based on a graphic novel, it's a dark, provocative look at the corrupting influence of power, and a team of heroes who essentially do the bidding of the corporation that manages them. Amazon has already ordered a second season...
FOR THE RECORD, PART FIVE
By Lisa Respers France:
-- A dance crew honored their friend on "America's Got Talent" and ended up receiving a golden buzzer...
-- Happy 50th birthday Jennifer Lopez! She's wearing it well!!!
-- Bindi Irwin got an engagement ring for her 21st birthday...
-- Valerie Harper's husband says he can't bring himself to send his ailing wife to hospice.
This week's episode of CNN's "Movies" podcast
Lisa emails:  On the latest episode of "Lisa, Sandra & Kristen Go to the Movies," we're joined by "Saturday Night Live" cast member Ego Nwodim who talks about her love of the film "Blue Valentine," dream biopic roles and more...
Check out the podcast here!
| | | Thank you for reading! Send me your feedback... We'll be back tomorrow... | | | |   |
| Mueller has something to disappoint everyone Posted: 24 Jul 2019 01:43 PM PDT Bloomberg Opinion Today Today's Agenda  Mueller Time Falls (Somewhat) Flat If you told a time traveler from, say, 2009 that today a former special counsel told Congress how Russia sabotaged the 2016 election to put Donald Trump in the White House, that time traveler's head might explode. Here in the bananas news universe of 2019, this event is known as "Wednesday." But Robert Mueller's appearance wasn't mundane just because we're all inured to insanity. The straight-shooting Boy Scout's testimony was deflated four months earlier by Trump's pet Attorney General, Roy Cohn impersonator Bill Barr, writes Tim O'Brien. As Mueller's mumbling, reticent performance made clear today, he was no match for the partisan knife-fighter who skewed public perception about Mueller's findings before he even knew what was happening. House Democrats may have hoped Mueller would produce some gotcha moment causing Republicans and reluctant Dems alike to suddenly cry out for impeachment. But those same Dems hurt their own cause by inexplicably putting Mueller's report on ice for months, Jonathan Bernstein writes, while also chopping Mueller's testimony into annoying five-minute bites filled mostly with requests to repeat the question. And Mueller did himself no favors with confusing answers about Trump's alleged obstruction of justice, writes Noah Feldman. Still, even without bombshells, these hearings helpfully clarified some basic facts to the public, Jonathan Bernstein writes in a second column. They shot down Trump and Barr's repeated claims of exoneration and laid out Mueller's mortifying findings for voters, most of whom never bothered to read his report. Even in 2019, that could be effective. Big Tech's Big Trouble Last night, Barr's Justice Department said it was investigating how America's biggest tech companies use market power to squash competition. The stock prices of the usual suspects – Alphabet Inc., Amazon.com Inc. and Facebook Inc. – shrugged. But this is a real threat for these companies, warns Shira Ovide, and their standard defenses won't cut it. Facebook investors may have been happy it got off relatively lightly over the whole Cambridge Analytica thing, paying a $5 billion fine and agreeing to form a new board committee to oversee user privacy. As Matt Levine notes, that committee will answer to Mark Zuckerberg, so not much has changed – though maybe it's still a step in the right direction. But Shira Ovide, in a second column, suggests the only way to protect user info is by cutting off Facebook's ability to gather it in the first place. Anyway, it's hard to shake the suspicion Trump's antitrust zeal here is political, maybe because Trump spends so much time railing against Big Tech's imagined personal affronts to him. It doesn't help that, just as the DOJ is launching this probe, it's apparently ready to rubber-stamp a merger of T-Mobile US Inc. and Sprint Corp. That deal will undermine competition far more than, say, the AT&T-Time Warner deal Trump opposed, writes Tara Lachapelle. Unloading some wireless spectrum to Dish Network Corp. to build a new competitor in the hazy future won't help consumers as much as keeping Sprint around. Further Tech Reading: Snap Inc. finally seems to be on the road to recovery. – Shira Ovide An Unserious Man After touching base with the Queen, Boris Johnson officially became Britain's prime minister today, ushering in what could well be the most dubious chapter in the Brexit story yet. The trouble is that Johnson seems to take nothing seriously, including the very real threat of a no-deal Brexit, writes Bloomberg's editorial board. Not surprisingly, nobody else takes him seriously either, so it's hard to rate his chances too highly. Like him or not, the European Union should help Johnson by renegotiating the Irish backstop that foiled Theresa May's many stabs at passing a Brexit deal, writes Clive Crook. That might let Johnson finally drag Britain out of the EU, which Clive thinks Europe should prefer to having the U.K. hanging around making trouble. Let's Don't Make a Budget Deal The budget accord Trump struck with Democrats this week is the wrong kind of bipartisanship, with both parties agreeing to set all the country's money on fire, writes Bloomberg's editorial board. With the economy in reasonably good shape, now's the time to get finances in order ahead of the next downturn. Even as he cut this deal, Trump also planned to cut three million people off of food stamps. Karl Smith writes this is not only cruel but self-defeating; food assistance for working families is a relatively low-cost boon to the economy. Telltale Charts Despite Trump's attacks, Huawei Technologies is heading for its best year of sales growth since 2016, writes Tim Culpan.  Immigrant remittances take money from the U.S. economy but don't much help their home economies, notes Noah Smith. The answer could be helping immigrants invest in productive development at home.  Further Reading China and the U.S. seem headed for an Athens-Sparta-type confrontation. – John Authers (who, by the way, will host a discussion on The Terminal at 10 a.m. New York time tomorrow about George Magnus's "Red Flags: Why Xi's China Is in Jeopardy") Deutsche Bank's goals rely on unrealistic interest-rate assumptions. Its credibility is fading fast. – Elisa Martinuzzi Caterpillar Inc. dumped a front-loader's worth of ice water on the market's misplaced optimism about industrials. – Brooke Sutherland Boeing Co., meanwhile, dumped ice water on its own misplaced optimism about the 737 Max's return. – Brooke Sutherland Corporate stock buybacks were basically illegal for a long time. They sure need more scrutiny than they get now. – Stephen Mihm Vladimir Putin is running out of legitimate-ish options for clinging to power when his term ends in 2024. – Leonid Bershidsky Ohio's free-market fans subsidize dying energy industries. - Liam Denning No, Al Franken wasn't treated unfairly. – Sarah Green Carmichael ICYMI Bernie Madoff asked Trump to cut his sentence. The number of million-dollar neighborhoods is shrinking. How to prepare for retirement when you're young. Kickers Old pair of sneakers sells for $437,500. (h/t Scott Kominers) Maybe we're thinking backwards about the mystery of consciousness. The theory of "quantum Darwinism" is passing early tests. We're in the biggest climate event in 2,000 years. Note: Please send sneakers and complaints to Mark Gongloff at mgongloff1@bloomberg.net. New to Bloomberg Opinion Today? Sign up here and follow us on Twitter and Facebook. | |   |
No comments:
Post a Comment